Register
The American Antitrust Institute’s 20th Annual Private Antitrust Enforcement Conference returns on November 5, 2026, at the National Press Club in Washington, D.C.—bringing together leading litigators, economists, and enforcers for a full day of substantive, practice-focused discussion. From mastering expert cross-examination to navigating AI-driven collusion and the evolving battleground of class action standing, this year’s program delivers timely insights and real-world strategies shaping modern antitrust litigation.
The conference is followed by AAI Awards Night at Hamilton Live, celebrating excellence in antitrust enforcement just across the street at 600 14th Street, N.W.
Registration for AAI Conference and Awards Night is closed.
CLE CREDITS:
This conference is approved by the Pennsylvania Continuing Legal Education Board for up to 5.75 CLE credit hours (course ID 362938). When you attend the conference, you will be provided a Certificate of Attendance. If you are a Pennsylvania attorney, AAI will submit and pay for the credits on your behalf. All attendees will receive an email with CLE instructions the day following the conference. Please read about AAI’s CLE procedures here.
REFUND POLICY:
Refunds for registration, minus a $50.00 processing fee, will be granted for all requests received 10 calendar days prior to the event. Refund requests must be sent in writing to aai@antitrustinstitute.org. Refund requests made within 10 days of the event will not be honored.
CONFERENCE APP:
Download the Eventee App on your phone and access all conference information.
Attendee List
A.B. Data
Analysis Group
Angeion Group
Berger Montague PC
Berkeley Research Group
Berman Tabacco
Christensen Associates
Cirque Analytics
Cohen Milstein
Cotchett Pitre & McCarthy LLP
Cuneo Gilbert Flannery & LaDuca LLP
DiCello Levitt LLP
DISCO
EisnerAmper
Epiq
Fine, Kaplan and Black
Freedman Boyd Hollander &
Goldberg P.A.
Garwin Gerstein & Fisher LLPGetnick & Getnick LLP
Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP.
Girard Sharp LLP
Greylock McKinnon Associates
Guerra LLP
Gupta Wessler LLP
Gustafson Gluek PLLC
Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP
Harvard Medical School
Hausfeld
Huntington Bank
Jeffrey L. Berhold, P.C.
Keller Rohrback LLP
Kellogg, Hansen, Todd, Figel & Frederick, P.L.L.C.
Kenyon Consulting LLC
Kirby McInerney LLP
Kozyak Tropin Throckmorton
Kroll
Latham & Watkins LLP
Levi & Korsinsky LLP
Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP
Lite DePalma Greenberg & Afanador, LLC
Lockridge Grindal Nauen PLLP
Lowey Dannenberg, P.C.
Monument Economics Group
Nichols Kaster
Odom & Des Roches, LLC
OSKR, LLC
Pearson Warshaw, LLP
Preti, Flaherty, Beliveau & Pachios LLP
Pritzker Levine LLP
Radice Law Firm
Robins Kaplan
Rust Consulting
Scott+Scott Attorneys at Law
Secretariat
Shinder Cantor Lerner LLP
Simonsen Sussman LLP
Simpluris
Spector Caldes & Corrigan PC
Taus, Cebulash & Landau, LLP
The Capitol Forum
University of Baltimore School of Law
University of North Florida
University of Virginia
UPenn Carey School of Law
Weinstein Kitchenoff & Asher LLC
Wexler Boley & Elgersma
Zelle LLP
Zimmerman Reed LLP
Young Lawyers Breakfast
Building a successful antitrust career takes more than mastering the law—it requires identifying opportunities, developing expertise, and making yourself indispensable. In this candid conversation, rising antitrust lawyers will share how they found meaningful roles on cases, carved out their own areas of expertise, built relationships with mentors, peers, and clients, and established their professional reputations early in their careers. Whether you’re looking to gain more courtroom experience, develop a niche, or simply take the next step in your career, this interactive breakfast discussion will provide practical advice and real-world perspectives from lawyers who have recently navigated a similar path.
Moderator:
Matthew Summers, Associate, Berger Montague
Panelists:
Ida Abhari, Associate, Hausfeld
Nina Jaffe-Geffner, Associate, Cohen Milstein
Kira Q. Le, Associate, Lockridge Grindal Nauen PLLP
Continental Breakfast
Welcome and Overview
Eric L. Cramer, Chairman, Berger Montague
Joshua P. Davis, Shareholder, Berger Montague
Crossing the Expert Economist: Winning Strategies for Depositions, Trial, and Arbitration
Expert testimony from economists can make or break an antitrust case, but effective cross-examination requires different strategies depending on the forum and the context. This interactive skills session will explore how to prepare for and execute expert cross-examinations in depositions, jury trials, bench trials, and arbitrations. Experienced trial lawyers and testifying economists will highlight what works—and what doesn’t—when challenging economic experts.
Moderator:
Joshua P. Davis, Shareholder, Berger Montague
Panelists:
Joe Goldberg, Partner, Freedman Boyd Hollander & Goldberg P.A.
Rebecca Kirk Fair, Managing Principal, Analysis Group
Belinda S. Lee, Partner, Latham & Watkins LLP
Russell W. Mangum III, Ph.D., Executive Vice President and Founding Partner, Cirque Analytics
Break
Algorithms, AI, and Agreement: Proving Collusion in the Digital Age
As artificial intelligence and pricing algorithms become increasingly sophisticated, courts and litigants are confronting new questions about whether and under what circumstances use of these tools can constitute an unlawful agreement under the antitrust laws. This panel will examine the latest developments in algorithmic pricing cases, exploring the ways AI impacts traditional theories of agreement and the types of evidence necessary to demonstrate it. Panelists will discuss recent decisions, emerging litigation trends, and what practitioners should expect as technology continues to test the limits of existing legal frameworks.
Moderator:
David O. Fisher, Senior Counsel, American Antitrust Institute
Panelists:
Greg Asciolla, Partner, DiCello Levitt LLP
Swathi Bojedla, Partner, Hausfeld
Giovanna Massarotto, Lecturer, University of Pennsylvania Carey School of Law
Networking Break
Luncheon
Everything Old Is New Again: Reviving Classic Antitrust Precedent for Modern Litigation
There are many pro-enforcement Supreme Court and appellate decisions that remain controlling law, but for a variety of reasons have fallen out of favor—until recently. This panel will explore how private and governmental practitioners are successfully relying on longstanding precedents involving tying, market definition, summary judgment, and other foundational issues in today’s cases. From Brown Shoe Co. v. United States to Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United States and beyond, panelists will discuss why these classic decisions remain relevant, how courts are applying them today, and what younger practitioners should know about the enduring foundations of antitrust law.
Moderator:
Dan Gustafson, Founding Member, Gustafson Gluek
Panelists:
Kellie Lerner, Managing Partner, Shinder Cantor Lerner
Catherine Simonsen, Partner, Simonsen Sussman LLP
Randy Stutz, President, American Antitrust Institute
Break
The New Battleground: Article III Standing in Antitrust Class Action Litigation
Article III standing has emerged as one of the most consequential threshold issues in modern antitrust class actions. With courts, including the Supreme Court, invoking common proof of standing across a class as a possible barrier to class certification, practitioners must be prepared to litigate these issues from the outset of a case. This panel will examine recent developments, discuss how standing arguments vary across different substantive antitrust claims, and explore practical strategies for both plaintiffs and defendants. Attendees will gain insight into why many litigators now view standing as a key procedural battleground in antitrust class actions.
Moderator:
Shana E. Scarlett, Partner, Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP
Panelists:
Elizabeth Cabraser, Partner, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP
Joshua P. Davis, Shareholder, Berger Montague
Christopher D. Dusseault, Partner, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP
Deepak Gupta, Founding Principal, Gupta Wessler LLP
Adjourn
Cocktail Reception at Hamilton Live
Awards Dinner at Hamilton Live
Panel 1: Crossing the Expert Economist: Winning Strategies for Depositions, Trial, and Arbitration
- Harry Caldwell & Deanne Elliot, Avoiding the Wrecking Ball of a Disastrous Cross Examination: Nine Principles for Effective Cross Examinations with Supporting Empirical Evidence, 70 S.C. L. Rev. 119 (2018)
- Edoardo Peruzzi, The Application of Economic Models into the Courtroom: A Failed Promise?(2025)
- Tom Branigan, Cross-Examination of Technical Experts, Mich. Bar J. (2015)
- Karen DeMasi & Jonathan J. Clark, The Expert Economist, N.Y. L. J. (2011)
- Rebecca Haw Allensworth, Adversarial Economics in Antitrust Litigation: Losing Academic Consensus in the Battle of the Experts, 106 Nw. U. L. Rev. 1261 (2012)
- Zach Barreto, How Expert Witness Strategy Changes in Bench Trials(2025)
Panel 2: Algorithms, AI, and Agreement: Proving Collusion in the Digital Age
- David Fisher, Tacit Agreements to Collude: Enforcing Section 1 of the Sherman Act in the Age of Algorithms, 40 Antitrust Mag. 30 (2025)
- Cornish-Adebiyi v. Caesars Ent., Inc., 184 F.4th 172 (3d Cir. 2026).
- Giovanna Massarotto, Detecting Algorithmic Collusion, 86 Ohio St. L. J. 817 (2025)
- Meher Sethi, The Algorithmic Antitrust Paradox, 10 Georgetown L. Tech. Rev. 195 (2026)
- Gibson v. Cendyn Group, LLC., 148 F.4th 1069 (9th Cir. 2025)
Panel 3: Everything Old Is New Again: Reviving Classic Antitrust Precedent for Modern Litigation
- Daniel A. Crane, Tying Law for the Digital Age, 99 Notre Dame L. Rev. 821 (2024)
- Daniel A. Hanley, Redefining the Relevant Market: Abandonment or Return to Brown Shoe, 129 Dick. L. Rev. 571 (2025)
- Brett Frischmann & Spencer Weber Waller, Revitalizing Essential Facilities, 75 Antitrust L.J. 1 (2008)
- George A. Hay, Horizontal Agreements: Concept and Proof, 51 Antitrust Bull. 877 (2006)
Panel 4: The New Battleground: Article III Standing in Antitrust Class Action Litigation
- Sharon Brett, Article III Standing and the Public Interest Class Action, 47 Cardozo L. Rev. 837 (2026)
- Kulvir Shukla & Abhinav Dwivedi, The Gate Before the Merits: Antitrust Standing and Environmental Grievances in the United States, the United Kingdom and India, 1 Oxford L. Rev. 311 (2026)
- Brief of Civil Procedure and Complex Litigation Law Professors, Laboratory Corp. v. Davis, No. 24-304 (April 7, 2025)
- Joshua P. Davis & Anupama K. Reddy, Unintended Consequences of Repealing the Direct Purchaser Rule, 84 Antitrust L.J. 341 (2022)
- Brief of the American Antitrust Institute as Amicus Curiae in Support of Plaintiffs-Appellees and Affirmance, In re JUUL Labs, Inc. Antitrust Litig., No. 26-2626 (9th Cir. Sept. 28, 2026).


